Sunday, February 24, 2019

Top Warren Buffett Stocks To Buy Right Now

tags:RENX,CACC,HR,PSF,NRZ,

Our favorite holding period is forever. -- Warren Buffett

Forever is an awfully long time. Heck, the average holding period for stocks isn't even one year anymore, since the advent of online trading, computer-driven high-speed trading, and steadily falling brokerage costs. But even with so much of a shift toward short-term trading, the most-effective way for individual investors to get the best returns remains the simplest: Buy great companies and hold them as long as possible. 

Owning stocks that pay a dividend can make it much easier to hold on to them, particularly if they have the ability to steadily increase the payout and solid prospects to grow the business. To help find the best long-term dividend stocks out there, we asked three of our Motley Fool investors for a little help. They came back with Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc (NASDAQ:GLPI), AES Corp (NYSE:AES), and Caretrust REIT Inc (NASDAQ:CTRE). 

Image source: Getty Images.

Top Warren Buffett Stocks To Buy Right Now: RELX N.V.(RENX)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Relx (NYSE:RENX) was upgraded by research analysts at Barclays to a “buy” rating in a report released on Monday.

    RENX has been the subject of several other research reports. Zacks Investment Research raised shares of Relx from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Thursday, August 16th. UBS Group cut shares of Relx from a “neutral” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note on Thursday, June 14th. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating and three have given a buy rating to the company. The stock presently has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $23.00.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Relx (RENX)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Top Warren Buffett Stocks To Buy Right Now: Credit Acceptance Corporation(CACC)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Credit Acceptance (NASDAQ:CACC) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, July 31st. The credit services provider reported $6.95 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $6.44 by $0.51. The business had revenue of $315.40 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $303.55 million. Credit Acceptance had a net margin of 46.43% and a return on equity of 28.97%. analysts anticipate that Credit Acceptance Corp. will post 27.68 earnings per share for the current year.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Credit Acceptance (NASDAQ:CACC) last posted its earnings results on Thursday, May 3rd. The credit services provider reported $6.11 earnings per share for the quarter, missing the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $6.19 by ($0.08). The company had revenue of $295.60 million for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $296.16 million. Credit Acceptance had a net margin of 43.49% and a return on equity of 29.44%. The firm’s quarterly revenue was up 12.5% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same period in the previous year, the firm earned $4.67 EPS. equities research analysts anticipate that Credit Acceptance will post 26.04 EPS for the current fiscal year.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Shares of Credit Acceptance Corp. (NASDAQ:CACC) have been assigned an average recommendation of “Hold” from the twelve research firms that are covering the stock, MarketBeat reports. Four equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, four have issued a hold rating, three have assigned a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company. The average twelve-month price target among brokers that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is $335.00.

Top Warren Buffett Stocks To Buy Right Now: Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated(HR)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    New Mexico Educational Retirement Board lessened its holdings in Healthcare Realty Trust Inc (NYSE:HR) by 14.8% during the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the SEC. The fund owned 29,300 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after selling 5,100 shares during the period. New Mexico Educational Retirement Board’s holdings in Healthcare Realty Trust were worth $852,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Schwab Charles Investment Management Inc. lifted its position in shares of Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (NYSE:HR) by 6.4% during the 1st quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor owned 1,785,099 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after acquiring an additional 107,342 shares during the quarter. Schwab Charles Investment Management Inc.’s holdings in Healthcare Realty Trust were worth $49,466,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Healthcare Realty Trust (HR)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Top Warren Buffett Stocks To Buy Right Now: Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund, Inc.(PSF)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Media stories about Cohen & Steers Select Pref & Inc Fd (NYSE:PSF) have trended positive recently, according to Accern Sentiment. The research firm ranks the sentiment of press coverage by reviewing more than 20 million news and blog sources in real time. Accern ranks coverage of publicly-traded companies on a scale of negative one to positive one, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. Cohen & Steers Select Pref & Inc Fd earned a media sentiment score of 0.39 on Accern’s scale. Accern also gave headlines about the company an impact score of 48.661768322942 out of 100, meaning that recent press coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an effect on the stock’s share price in the near future.

Top Warren Buffett Stocks To Buy Right Now: New Residential Investment Corp.(NRZ)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Shares of New Residential Investment Corp (NYSE:NRZ) have been given an average recommendation of “Buy” by the ten analysts that are presently covering the stock, MarketBeat reports. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, seven have given a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company. The average twelve-month price objective among analysts that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is $18.87.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Here are some of the media stories that may have impacted Accern’s analysis:

    Get New Residential Investment alerts: On your bad day this might appear as a lifeline: New Residential Investment Corp. (NRZ) (fintelegraph.com) EPS Evaluation – New Residential Investment Corp (NYSE: NRZ) (stocksmarketcap.com) Active Stock Evaluation – New Residential Investment Corp. (NYSE: NRZ) (financerater.com) New Residential Investment Corp. (NRZ): Technical Indicators: (stockquote.review) What Do Analysts’ Recommend? – New Residential Investment Corp. (NYSE:NRZ) (nasdaqjournal.com)

    Shares of New Residential Investment opened at $18.10 on Monday, Marketbeat.com reports. New Residential Investment has a 1-year low of $15.04 and a 1-year high of $18.43. The stock has a market cap of $6.08 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 6.40 and a beta of 0.90.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Natixis Advisors L.P. reduced its position in shares of New Residential Investment Corp (NYSE:NRZ) by 23.2% in the 1st quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 235,486 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after selling 71,224 shares during the quarter. Natixis Advisors L.P. owned about 0.07% of New Residential Investment worth $3,874,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    New Residential Investment (NYSE: NRZ) and Paramount Group (NYSE:PGRE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Royal Bank of Canada boosted its stake in shares of New Residential Investment Corp (NYSE:NRZ) by 144.9% in the first quarter, HoldingsChannel reports. The institutional investor owned 831,287 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after purchasing an additional 491,807 shares during the period. Royal Bank of Canada’s holdings in New Residential Investment were worth $13,675,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

Thursday, February 21, 2019

Why Alphabet and salesforce.com Bought a Piece of GoCardless

For a couple of giants like Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) (NASDAQ:GOOG) and salesforce.com (NYSE:CRM), $75 million is pocket change. But that doesn't mean they aren't thoughtful about where they invest, so if they shelled that sum out for a stake in the U.K. start-up GoCardless, assume smart folks gave it some thought. GoCardless, a fintech start-up that lets its clients collect recurring payments from online customers via automated direct debit, will use this capital infusion to help fund its U.S. and international expansion.

In this segment from MarketFoolery, host Mac Greer and senior analysts Ron Gross and Jason Moser talk about where the company fits in the ongoing "war on cash" narrative, how big its opportunity could be, and why the big guys would want a piece of that action.

A full transcript follows the video.

This video was recorded on Feb. 19, 2019.

Mac Greer: Let's turn to the war on cash. Jason Moser, I know this is one of your favorite topics. Alphabet and Salesforce are investing $75 million in a U.K. online payments start-up, GoCardless. Jason, this investment will help GoCardless expand to the U.S. What's going on here?

Jason Moser: First and foremost, this is a drop in the bucket for Alphabet and Salesforce. This is just a rounding error for them. It makes a lot of sense for them to try to invest a little bit in the space to participate because clearly, we've seen this move toward a cashless society, not only on the consumer side but on the commercial side as well. That's what GoCardless does.

GoCardless is working in a specific niche. They're working with businesses and recurring payments. If you're a business with a recurring payment, perhaps it's a subscription or some type of bill that you're paying. They're working with those businesses to get more a part of that market. From the consumer side, for an analogy, let's just liken it to, you have your mortgage payment direct debited from your checking account every month. I'd love to be able to put my mortgage on my credit card every month because it'd be free points.

Ron Gross: Yeah, that'd be great.

Moser: But, we can't do that. So, next logical thing is to have your bank go ahead and withdraw that money on behalf of the mortgage company. Essentially, GoCardless is working in that realm. And it's a very lucrative market. When you look at business-to-business opportunity, Mastercard was recently quoted on their call calling that opportunity, the dollars that flow through that business-to-business network on a global basis -- I'm going to give you a guess, Mac. How big do you think that number is? Wild guess.

Greer: It's in the billions.

Moser: Technically.

Greer: It's in the multiple billions.

Moser: $125 trillion.

Greer: Oh, my gosh!

Moser: Now, I'm talking about the money that flows through all of those networks. When you look domestically, you're looking at about a $25 trillion dollar network. That's why they're trying to play into that market. Even just capturing a small slice of it is meaningful for a company like GoCardless. So, working on those recurring payments as a direct debit vs. making a car payment, there are puts and takes for either way you do it. But, I think in a lot of cases with businesses that are looking to have a recurring, predictable payment taken out from their account, this is just an easy way to do it.

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019

tags:NBR,REC,BTE,TGC,MCF,

You've worked hard for your money, and now you'd like to protect it. But you'd also like to generate a solid -- and ideally, growing -- stream of income from your investment portfolio, one that can give you the freedom you deserve in retirement.

Fortunately, there are a select few businesses that can help you do just that. Read on to learn about one of the best income investments available in the market today.

Searching for yield? Then check out this company. Image source: Getty Images.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (NYSE:BIP) is one of the largest infrastructure companies in the world, with a broad and diverse collection of high-quality assets spanning five continents.

Brookfield operates in four main segments: utilities, transportation, energy, and communications infrastructure -- think electricity distribution lines, toll roads, pipelines, and cell towers.

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Nabors Industries Ltd.(NBR)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR) has been assigned an average recommendation of “Buy” from the twenty-one research firms that are currently covering the stock, Marketbeat Ratings reports. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, five have assigned a hold rating and fourteen have given a buy rating to the company. The average 12-month target price among brokers that have covered the stock in the last year is $9.18.

  • [By Dan Caplinger]

    The stock market had a mildly positive day on Friday, and gains of between 0.1% and 0.3% were common for most of the major benchmark indexes. Without any outright hostility among leaders of the G-7 nations in their summit in Canada's Quebec City, investors seemed content to go into the weekend with confidence in the prospects for the U.S. economy and its biggest businesses. Yet some individual companies had bad news that held their shares back from participating in the rally. Nabors Industries (NYSE:NBR), PolarityTE (NASDAQ:COOL), and Evolus (NASDAQ:EOLS) were among the worst performers on the day. Here's why they did so poorly.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Niobio Cash (CURRENCY:NBR) traded 7.5% lower against the US dollar during the 24-hour period ending at 20:00 PM E.T. on August 22nd. Niobio Cash has a market cap of $190,704.00 and approximately $242.00 worth of Niobio Cash was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours. One Niobio Cash coin can now be purchased for about $0.0018 or 0.00000028 BTC on major cryptocurrency exchanges including TradeOgre and Crex24. During the last seven days, Niobio Cash has traded up 11.4% against the US dollar.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Nabors Industries (NYSE:NBR) received a $12.00 price target from analysts at Royal Bank of Canada in a report issued on Thursday. The firm currently has a “buy” rating on the oil and gas company’s stock. Royal Bank of Canada’s target price suggests a potential upside of 92.31% from the stock’s previous close.

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: REC Silicon ASA (REC)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Regalcoin (CURRENCY:REC) traded up 10.1% against the US dollar during the 1 day period ending at 22:00 PM E.T. on February 7th. One Regalcoin coin can now be purchased for about $0.0047 or 0.00000139 BTC on popular exchanges including YoBit, CoinExchange and BTC-Alpha. Regalcoin has a total market capitalization of $60,267.00 and $9.00 worth of Regalcoin was traded on exchanges in the last day. During the last week, Regalcoin has traded down 2.2% against the US dollar.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Regalcoin (CURRENCY:REC) traded up 5.2% against the U.S. dollar during the 1 day period ending at 19:00 PM E.T. on May 27th. Regalcoin has a total market cap of $496,466.00 and $1,256.00 worth of Regalcoin was traded on exchanges in the last day. During the last week, Regalcoin has traded 1.9% higher against the U.S. dollar. One Regalcoin coin can currently be purchased for about $0.0388 or 0.00000529 BTC on cryptocurrency exchanges including BTC-Alpha, CoinExchange and YoBit.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Regalcoin (REC) is a PoW/PoS coin that uses the
    X11 hashing algorithm. Its launch date was September 28th, 2017. Regalcoin’s total supply is 16,491,413 coins and its circulating supply is 12,799,009 coins. The Reddit community for Regalcoin is /r/RegalCoin and the currency’s Github account can be viewed here. Regalcoin’s official Twitter account is @regalcoinx and its Facebook page is accessible here. The official website for Regalcoin is regalcoin.co.

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Baytex Energy Corp(BTE)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Baytex Energy (NYSE: BTE) and Diamond Offshore Drilling (NYSE:DO) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

  • [By Dan Caplinger]

    Wall Street continued its downward streak on Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling more than 100 points. Most major benchmarks fell more modestly, with a few actually poking into positive territory on the day. Trade-sensitive stocks were among the weakest as investors focused on uncertainty related to tariff disputes between the U.S. and China. But for some other companies, bad news of a different sort was responsible for the drops in their shares. Biogen (NASDAQ:BIIB), Baytex Energy (NYSE:BTE), and Catalyst Biosciences (NASDAQ:CBIO) were among the worst performers on the day. Here's why they did so poorly.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    BitSerial (CURRENCY:BTE) traded 4.5% lower against the US dollar during the 1-day period ending at 17:00 PM E.T. on May 27th. During the last seven days, BitSerial has traded down 22.8% against the US dollar. One BitSerial token can now be bought for about $0.0038 or 0.00000052 BTC on major exchanges. BitSerial has a total market capitalization of $0.00 and $37.00 worth of BitSerial was traded on exchanges in the last day.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Baytex Energy (NYSE:BTE) (TSE:BTE) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, May 3rd. The oil and gas producer reported ($0.21) earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of ($0.13) by ($0.08). Baytex Energy had a negative return on equity of 4.74% and a net margin of 4.57%. The firm had revenue of $226.37 million during the quarter. sell-side analysts expect that Baytex Energy Corp will post -0.28 earnings per share for the current year.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Baytex Energy (BTE)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Shares of Baytex Energy Corp (NYSE:BTE) (TSE:BTE) have been assigned a consensus rating of “Buy” from the twelve ratings firms that are currently covering the stock, MarketBeat.com reports. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, one has assigned a hold rating and nine have assigned a buy rating to the company. The average 12 month target price among analysts that have issued a report on the stock in the last year is $4.00.

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Tengasco, Inc.(TGC)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Tigercoin (CURRENCY:TGC) traded down 3.5% against the dollar during the 24 hour period ending at 7:00 AM E.T. on August 23rd. During the last seven days, Tigercoin has traded 8.4% lower against the dollar. Tigercoin has a total market capitalization of $98,130.00 and approximately $0.00 worth of Tigercoin was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours. One Tigercoin coin can now be purchased for about $0.0023 or 0.00000035 BTC on popular exchanges.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Tigercoin (TGC) is a proof-of-work (PoW) coin that uses the SHA256 hashing algorithm. It launched on September 6th, 2013. Tigercoin’s total supply is 43,536,800 coins. The official website for Tigercoin is tigercoin.wordpress.com. Tigercoin’s official Twitter account is @TigerCoin.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Tigercoin (CURRENCY:TGC) traded 12.1% lower against the US dollar during the 1-day period ending at 23:00 PM E.T. on May 6th. One Tigercoin coin can now be bought for $0.0077 or 0.00000083 BTC on popular cryptocurrency exchanges. In the last week, Tigercoin has traded 6.4% lower against the US dollar. Tigercoin has a total market cap of $334,680.00 and approximately $64.00 worth of Tigercoin was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Tigercoin (CURRENCY:TGC) traded flat against the dollar during the 24-hour period ending at 18:00 PM ET on October 5th. Tigercoin has a market cap of $103,538.00 and approximately $3.00 worth of Tigercoin was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours. One Tigercoin coin can now be purchased for about $0.0024 or 0.00000036 BTC on major exchanges. Over the last week, Tigercoin has traded 12.4% lower against the dollar.

Hot Energy Stocks To Watch For 2019: Contango Oil & Gas Company(MCF)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Fmr LLC increased its position in shares of Contango Oil & Gas (NYSEAMERICAN:MCF) by 33.5% during the second quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 3,583,039 shares of the oil and natural gas company’s stock after buying an additional 899,900 shares during the quarter. Fmr LLC owned 13.93% of Contango Oil & Gas worth $20,352,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    COPYRIGHT VIOLATION NOTICE: “Contango Oil & Gas (MCF) Short Interest Update” was originally published by Ticker Report and is owned by of Ticker Report. If you are reading this article on another site, it was copied illegally and republished in violation of US and international copyright & trademark laws. The correct version of this article can be read at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/3346537/contango-oil-gas-mcf-short-interest-update.html.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Fondren Management LP purchased a new position in shares of Contango Oil & Gas (NYSEAMERICAN:MCF) in the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the SEC. The institutional investor purchased 60,000 shares of the oil and natural gas company’s stock, valued at approximately $341,000. Fondren Management LP owned 0.23% of Contango Oil & Gas as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Hot Stocks To Invest In 2019

tags:HMNY,NWN,RFG,

Chairman and CEO of Safety, Income And Growth Inc (NYSE:SAFE) Jay Sugarman bought 5,479 shares of SAFE on 05/16/2018 at an average price of $18.36 a share. The total cost of this purchase was $100,594.

Safety Income and Growth Inc is a real estate company. It is formed primarily to acquire, own, manage, finance and capitalize ground net leases. Safety, Income and Growth Inc has a market cap of $334.340 million; its shares were traded at around $18.38 with and P/S ratio of 9.08. The dividend yield of Safety, Income and Growth Inc stocks is 2.49%.

CEO Recent Trades:

Chairman and CEO Jay Sugarman bought 5,479 shares of SAFE stock on 05/16/2018 at the average price of $18.36. The price of the stock has increased by 0.11% since.Chairman and CEO Jay Sugarman bought 5,530 shares of SAFE stock on 05/14/2018 at the average price of $17.83. The price of the stock has increased by 3.08% since.Chairman and CEO Jay Sugarman bought 5,440 shares of SAFE stock on 05/10/2018 at the average price of $18.01. The price of the stock has increased by 2.05% since.Chairman and CEO Jay Sugarman bought 5,735 shares of SAFE stock on 05/08/2018 at the average price of $17.86. The price of the stock has increased by 2.91% since.Chairman and CEO Jay Sugarman bought 5,680 shares of SAFE stock on 05/04/2018 at the average price of $17.55. The price of the stock has increased by 4.73% since.

Directors and Officers Recent Trades:

Hot Stocks To Invest In 2019: Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc(HMNY)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Rich Smith]

    It's official: After suffering another yet another big drop in share price -- down 28% as of 12:40 p.m. EDT -- shares of Helios and Matheson Analytics (NASDAQ:HMNY) now sell for a lower per-share price than they did last week, before the company effected its 250-for-1 reverse stock split.

  • [By Paul Ausick]

    Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. (NASDAQ: HMNY) fell about 13% Friday to post a new 52-week low of $0.40 after closing at $0.46 on Thursday. The 52-week high is $38.86. Volume of more than 17 million was about 70% above the daily average of about 10.5 million. The company that owns MoviePass had no specific news again today, but shares continue to sink quite nicely with no extra help required.

  • [By Paul Ausick]

    Helios and Matheson Analytics, Inc. (NASDAQ: HMNY) fell by about 43% Wednesday to post a new 52-week low of $0.82 after closing at $1.45 on Tuesday. The 52-week high is $38.86. Volume of about 37 million was more more than five times the daily average of about 6.8 million. The company said in a Monday SEC filing that it needs to raise more cash to prop up its MoviePass business. Shareholders can’t hit the exits fast enough.

  • [By Steve Symington, Anders Bylund, and Rich Duprey]

    We asked three top Motley Fool investors to weigh in to that end. Here's why they like Under Armour (NYSE:UA)(NYSE:UAA), Helios & Matheson (NASDAQ:HMNY), and Zillow Group (NASDAQ:Z)(NASDAQ:ZG).

  • [By Rich Duprey]

    Here we go again. Helios and Matheson Analytics (NASDAQ:HMNY) has resurrected the MoviePass "unlimited" movie plan, offering subscribers access to one movie per day for $10 a month. But there's a catch: The plan is only open to moviegoers that had previously subscribed to the unlimited option but didn't choose the new three-movie-a-month plan offered when MoviePass killed off the unlimited one.

  • [By Rich Smith]

    Helios and Matheson Analytics (NASDAQ:HMNY) shares surged 21.8% in early Thursday trading before settling down to something more like a 5.2% gain as of 11:25 a.m. EDT. The reason: MoviePass is turning itself into an online version of the "coupon book."

Hot Stocks To Invest In 2019: Northwest Natural Gas Company(NWN)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Northwest Natural Gas (NWN)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Shares of Northwest Natural Gas Co (NYSE:NWN) reached a new 52-week high during mid-day trading on Monday . The company traded as high as $70.44 and last traded at $70.20, with a volume of 1123 shares changing hands. The stock had previously closed at $68.82.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    NW Natural (NYSE:NWN) was downgraded by equities research analysts at ValuEngine from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a note issued to investors on Wednesday.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Northwest Natural Gas (NWN)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Hot Stocks To Invest In 2019: Guggenheim S&P MidCap 400 Pure Gr ETF (RFG)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF (NYSEARCA:RFG) announced a quarterly dividend on Monday, September 24th, Wall Street Journal reports. Investors of record on Tuesday, September 25th will be given a dividend of 0.5521 per share on Friday, September 28th. This represents a $2.21 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 1.33%. The ex-dividend date is Monday, September 24th. This is a boost from Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.26.

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Apple Likely to Tout 2 New Subscription Services at March 25 Event

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) may finally be ready to unveil its news and video-streaming subscription services, according to reports this past week about a planned March 25 event.

While both projects have long been rumored, Apple has released no real details about them. The tech giant has been under increased pressure to come up with additional revenue streams to counterbalance a dip in iPhone sales and a maturing smartphone market. For the past quarter, the company's iPhone revenue was down 15%, year over year.

Having 1.4 billion active iPhone devices worldwide that it can push new services on, such as news and video subscriptions, makes this a potentially fruitful announcement. 

Tim Cook stands on stage at the annual iPhone launch event in October 2018.

Tim Cook at the iPhone launch last October. Apple's next event might be coming soon, as it preps to two subscription services. Image source: Apple.

1. Apple's video streaming hub

Apple has said it wants to give consumers a way to access all of their streaming services from one app. That's because, as the streaming space expands to include companies like Disney (NYSE: DIS), Apple, HBO, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), and others, users are having to subscribe to two or more services and navigating separate apps for each one. 

The combined service is expected to be offered as part of Apple's TV app. The idea is to make available original content, as well as programs from other video subscription options such as Starz and Showtime. There is no set date for the launch. Speculation right now says to expect it anywhere from April to sometime in the fall. 

Sources say Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) has not signed on to be part of the app, but that Apple is still in talks with HBO about joining, according to CNBC. Last year, Apple was said to have spent $1 billion developing its own original shows, similar to Netflix and its now-six-year-old original-content strategy. Apple's level of spending doesn't quite match up to Netflix's content budget, which is reportedly $15 billion (up from $8 billion in 2018). 

2. Apple's news service hub

The news publishing industry is still adjusting to the digital age and figuring out how to best monetize its content. Apple thinks it can help. The company plans to launch a bundled news service to customers that will allow them to subscribe to multiple publishers using one app. 

This seems like a decent idea considering more and more print newspapers have decided the best way to make money is through subscriptions -- both online and print. But newsrooms continue to tighten budgets, and Apple is reportedly asking publishers for a 50% cut of the revenue made through its new product, according to The Wall Street Journal. It's possible Apple will have a tough time getting publishers to sign on to the project and may explain why the company has been slow to launch it. 

Why subscription services?

Apple is well known for being late to tech trends, but then trying -- and often succeeding -- in taking over anyway. Apple wasn't the first tech company to make an MP3 player, but soon came out with the superior iPod that was an instant hit. It also didn't come out with the first smartphone, but with the launch of the iPhone in 2008, it soon became the dominant player. More recently, it also came out with the HomePod a few years after Amazon launched the Echo, hoping to be the best in that segment as well.

Now, Apple is trying to catch up in both the video streaming and news subscription markets. It figures the best way it can jump in and become a dominant player with a significant revenue stream is by becoming the go-to hub for both services.

In a way, it's a shortcut. Apple doesn't have to put in as much work, it just creates a marketplace for publishers and video streamers to sell their own work. This is something Apple has had successs with before: Simplifying products and making them available to a wide audience. 

Apple will also be contributing to the original content offerings on the service, which could help attract interest and users and create a mutually beneficial relationship with potential partners. Struggling publishers and desperate Netflix competitors would need a good reason to turn down the chance to have their content easily accessible on the 1.4 billion Apple devices currently in use. For them, even a 50/50 revenue deal with Apple may be worth it. 

Saturday, February 16, 2019

Accumulate Gujarat Gas; target of Rs 141: Dolat Capital


Dolat Capital's research report on Gujarat Gas


Gujarat Gas volumes were in line with estimates at 603 MMSCMD. Revenue at ` 21 bn in line with estimates. We are positively surprised by the profitability performance Gujarat Gas took price hikes to negate increase in input cost. Gross spreads were higher by 49% on a sequential basis. This is probably the highest spread ever reported by Gujarat Gas after BG exit. In the past, Gujarat Gas has shown high level of spreads and revert to lower levels in the immediate following quarter. We will like to closely watch this trend in coming quarters. With recent strategy of management to focus on profitable volumes, we believe that margins should sustain around ` 8 per SCM in the current quarter. Volumes are expected to increase as the reach expands and hence will take some time.


Outlook


We believe that if Gujarat Gas spreads can be sustained consistently, stock is due for a re-rating. We bring in FY21 estimates. Upgrade to Accumulate with a target price of ` 141 based on DCF valuation.


For all recommendations report, click here


Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on moneycontrol.com are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.

Read More First Published on Feb 15, 2019 03:40 pm

Friday, February 15, 2019

Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc (AJRD) Position Reduced by Victory Capital Management Inc.

Victory Capital Management Inc. cut its holdings in Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc (NYSE:AJRD) by 10.1% during the fourth quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the SEC. The fund owned 2,064,627 shares of the aerospace company’s stock after selling 232,451 shares during the period. Victory Capital Management Inc. owned 2.64% of Aerojet Rocketdyne worth $72,737,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

Other institutional investors and hedge funds have also added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Pacer Advisors Inc. acquired a new position in Aerojet Rocketdyne in the third quarter valued at approximately $360,000. Paloma Partners Management Co acquired a new position in Aerojet Rocketdyne in the third quarter valued at approximately $1,763,000. James Investment Research Inc. acquired a new position in Aerojet Rocketdyne in the fourth quarter valued at approximately $1,053,000. Carillon Tower Advisers Inc. lifted its holdings in Aerojet Rocketdyne by 40.5% in the third quarter. Carillon Tower Advisers Inc. now owns 1,860,944 shares of the aerospace company’s stock valued at $63,253,000 after acquiring an additional 536,697 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Seven Eight Capital LP acquired a new position in Aerojet Rocketdyne in the third quarter valued at approximately $207,000.

Get Aerojet Rocketdyne alerts:

A number of research firms recently commented on AJRD. Zacks Investment Research upgraded Aerojet Rocketdyne from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $45.00 price objective on the stock in a report on Wednesday. Credit Suisse Group raised Aerojet Rocketdyne from a “neutral” rating to an “outperform” rating in a research report on Monday, January 14th. Finally, ValuEngine raised Aerojet Rocketdyne from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, November 1st. Four analysts have rated the stock with a buy rating, The stock currently has a consensus rating of “Buy” and a consensus price target of $43.00.

NYSE AJRD traded up $0.33 on Thursday, reaching $39.92. The stock had a trading volume of 4,454 shares, compared to its average volume of 842,283. The firm has a market cap of $3.10 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 53.95, a PEG ratio of 4.99 and a beta of 0.80. The company has a quick ratio of 1.24, a current ratio of 1.24 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.90. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc has a 12-month low of $25.06 and a 12-month high of $40.99.

COPYRIGHT VIOLATION WARNING: “Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc (AJRD) Position Reduced by Victory Capital Management Inc.” was posted by Ticker Report and is the sole property of of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this piece of content on another publication, it was illegally copied and reposted in violation of United States & international copyright laws. The original version of this piece of content can be read at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4151457/aerojet-rocketdyne-holdings-inc-ajrd-position-reduced-by-victory-capital-management-inc.html.

Aerojet Rocketdyne Company Profile

Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc engages in the provision of innovative solutions in the field of aerospace and defense, as well as in the field of real estate. It operates through the following business segments: Aerospace & Defense, and Real Estate. The Aerospace & Defense segment operates through the Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc in developing and manufacturing of aerospace and defense products and systems for the United States government, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, major aerospace and defense prime contractors as well as portions of the commercial sector.

Read More: Diversification Important in Investing

Want to see what other hedge funds are holding AJRD? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc (NYSE:AJRD).

Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Aerojet Rocketdyne (NYSE:AJRD)

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Chimera Investment Corp (CIM) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Chimera Investment Corp  (NYSE:CIM)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 13, 2019, 9:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to Chimera Investment Corporation Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions)

It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Emily Mohr of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Emily Mohr -- Head of Investor Relations

Thank you, Nicole, and thank you, everyone, for participating in Chimera's fourth quarter and full year earnings conference call. Before we begin, I'd like to review the safe harbor statements. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in the risk factor section in our most recent annual and quarterly SEC filings. Actual events and results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the forward-looking statement disclaimer in our earnings release, in addition to our quarterly and annual filings.

During the call today, we may also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our SEC filings and earnings supplement for reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP measures. Additionally, the content of this conference call may contain time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this earnings call. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise this information.

I will now turn the conference over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Matthew Lambiase.

Matthew J. Lambiase -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Emily. Welcome to the fourth quarter 2018 Chimera Investment earnings call. Joining me on the call this morning are Mohit Marria, our CIO; Rob Colligan, our CFO; Choudhary Yarlagadda, our COO; and Victor Falvo, Chimera's Head of Capital Markets.

I'll make some brief comments, then Mohit will review the activity for our portfolio and Rob will go over the financial results. Afterward, we'll open up the call for questions.

The fourth quarter was one of the most volatile periods in recent memory due to fears relating to Brexit, Italy's monetary problems, China/US trade tariffs and a looming government -- US government shutdown as well as some economic data which seem to imply the US economy's growth is starting to slow. The market's final kick in the shins occurred on December 19th when the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate for the fourth time in 2018 by 25 basis points. These factors help send investors into a risk-off mode, driving the S&P 500 down 9.2% in December. It was the first worst December for US equities since the Great Depression.

Like equities, the fixed income markets also experienced great volatility in the fourth quarter. 10-year US Treasury notes hit a seven-year high of 3.24% in November, then rallied significantly to close the quarter at a 2.68% yield. The surprising reversal in treasury yields in the relatively short period left most fixed income -- most of the fixed income market struggling to keep up, and most sectors underperformed the price action of treasuries.

Chimera's portfolio was not immune to the market dislocation in the fourth quarter. As most know, mortgage-backed securities did not perform well and markets experienced high volatility due to the embedded prepayment options of mortgage. As rates rallied into the close of 2018, we witnessed spreads on Agency mortgage-backed securities widen versus comparable-duration US treasuries and interest rate swaps. Additionally, Chimera's Agency CMBS portfolio experienced increased spread volatility due to the impending and ultimately partial closing of the US government.

The uncertainty of the government shutdown relating to how the FHA would handle construction loan draws cost Ginnie Mae CLC yield spreads to further widen in the fourth quarter. As you would expect, the longer duration of these assets experienced more price volatility than residential Agency MBS pass-throughs. While we are not happy with the price action in the quarter, we think the current market represents a buying opportunity, and we are actively looking ahead to our Agency CMBS portfolio. Although this was a tough quarter for Chimera's book value, we believe our asset mix and risk profile will continue to deliver solid returns for our investors.

This market volatility has impacted asset and liability pricing in the short-term. These price movements have had no impact on our high-yielding non-agency portfolio. Both our non-Agency and loan portfolios remain strong and continue to perform better than our projections made at initial investment.

For the full year of 2018, Chimera had many achievements. Despite a difficult fourth quarter market environment, Chimera generated a positive 6.2% total economic return for the full year of 2018. Chimera successfully raised $260 million Series C preferred, and subsequent to calendar year-end, we raised another $200 million Series D preferred stock. All preferred shares carry dividend rates below our common stock.

Chimera completed nine securitizations in 2018, of which, four represented successful resecuritizations of previous Chimera deals. Loan securitizations continue to be a key differentiator for Chimera among our peers and produces good, consistent stream of core earnings for our portfolio. Chimera has increased its holdings of Agency securities, serving our shareholders by generating good spread income while also providing the added benefit of liquidity for our investment portfolio.

Last night, our Board of Directors declared the first quarter 2019 dividend of $0.50 per share and consistent with the past, our Board announced an intent to pay $2.00 common dividend for the full year of 2019.

As I stated on previous earnings calls, the end of tightening cycles can bring periods of high volatility, and we believe this will continue until the Federal Reserve sets a clear direction and the global political risks get sorted out. Our balance sheet continues to generate consistent core earnings and remains flexible to adapt to the market conditions. Chimera's high-yielding credit portfolio and large liquid Agency portfolio puts us in a strong position to continue to generate good dividend income for our shareholders.

I'll now turn the call over to Mohit to discuss the portfolio activity in the period.

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

Thank you, Matt. The fourth quarter of 2018 did indeed represent a period of increased interest rate and spread volatility in the fixed income market. Interest rates initially rose in the quarter but rallied dramatically in December, leading to a significant spread widening across fixed income products. The Federal Reserve raised short-term interest rate for the fourth time in 2018, which was the ninth time since the beginning of this cycle of monetary tightening. As we move into 2019, the Federal Reserve has taken a slightly more dovish stance, and Chairman Powell has recently stated the case for raising rates has weakened somewhat. We believe the Fed will remain data dependent in their approach to Fed policy and anticipate one rate hike for 2019.

December stock market volatility caused a flight to safety among many investors, leading to strong price performance in US Treasury bonds. This sharp movement in rates and spreads, while somewhat painful for existing positions and year-end book value, it provides a good backdrop for future investments and can lead to good opportunities as we look ahead into 2019.

It is important to note that the changes in book value over the past quarter is a direct result of these sharp interest rate changes, spread movements and their impact on hedge positions. And the fourth quarter decline in book value was not a result of unexpected credit losses in the portfolio.

Lastly, the repo markets operated as business as usual in the fourth quarter with the uptick in price volatility. Chimera's securitized loan in non-agency securities continued to perform well in our portfolio. While still maintaining a strong conviction in future credit performance for season's small-balanced loans, we were able to purchase two separate loan packages in the fourth quarter totaling roughly $328 million with a combined profile of $68,000 average loan balance, a 5.8% weighted average coupon and nearly 10 years of seasoning. The age, coupon and loan size of these purchases had many of the same characteristics of loans currently held in our portfolio. And we expect prepayments, defaults and severity profiles of these two purchases to be comparable to Chimera's existing $13 billion season low loan balance portfolio.

These recent purchases are currently being financed on our warehouse lines at accretive rates to our portfolio. We will continue to monitor the fixed income markets for opportunities to securitize these loans and lock in long-term spread income for the portfolio. Portfolio team continues to be active optimizing our previously securitized debt liability. During the fourth quarter, Chimera called $460 million of CIM 2015-4AG and refinanced into $478 million of CIM 2018-R6 by selling $335 million in senior debt with a coupon of 3.36%, reducing our financing cost by over 100 basis points.

In late September, Chimera raised $260 million in capital by issuing Series C 7.75% fixed to floating rate preferred stock. Most of this new capital was deployed into agency pass-throughs in October as spreads on those securities began to lighten. In total, we deployed on a hedged basis, $2.4 billion of newly originated Fannie Mae 4% securities and $366 million in Agency CMBS. Chimera's agency portfolio now stands at $11.9 billion current phase and consists of $9 billion of residential agency pass-throughs and $2.9 billion of Agency CMBS. Agency investments now represent 45% of Chimera's total assets. This is our highest percentage of agencies since the first quarter of 2016 and early to mid-2014 period.

Chimera as a hybrid REIT has a long history of shifting its portfolio among Agency and credit investments, as we see changes in relative value and long-term residential credit investment opportunity. In 2014, Chimera used the Agency portfolio as a source of liquidity to make the long-term investment in our Springleaf portfolio. And over time, we optimized our initial investment through two full cycles of securitizations. In 2016, Chimera again used the Agency portfolio as liquidity to purchase large blocks of low loan balance season performing whole loans. The 2,000 securitizations become callable and potential refinance and optimization opportunities beginning mid-2020.

The hybrid model provides great flexibility for maximizing market opportunities and asset allocation, liability management and successful capital raises like Chimera's four separate preferred stock issuances. Our portfolio team continues to believe that leveraged Agency MBS represent good value and provide both good spread income and increased liquidity for our investment portfolio. We continue to seek our Agency CMBS for long-term investments and actively look for credit investment opportunities to add to our portfolio. We believe we are well positioned with complementary balance of Agency and credit investment as we head into 2019.

I will now turn the call over to Rob to review the financial results.

Robert Colligan -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Mohit. I'll review Chimera's financial highlights for the fourth quarter and full year of 2018. GAAP book value at the end of the fourth quarter was $15.90 per share and our economic loss on GAAP book value was 3.7%, based on the quarterly change in book value and the fourth quarter dividend per common share.

Our economic return for the year was 6.2%. GAAP net loss for the fourth quarter was $117 million compared to $147 million of net income last quarter. For the year, GAAP net income was $368 million compared to $491 million last year. On a core basis, net income for the fourth quarter was $109 million or $0.58 per share, down slightly from last quarter. Securitization deal expenses were $4 million in the fourth quarter compared to $1 million incurred in the third quarter. For the year, core net income was $440 million, consistent with core income earned in 2017.

Economic net interest income for the fourth quarter was $154 million, up from $148 million last quarter. The increase in net interest income relates primarily to the increase in Chimera's Agency portfolio, partially offset by higher financing costs. For the year, economic net interest income was $593 million, up from $589 million last year. For the fourth quarter, the yield on average interest-earning assets was 5.7%. Our average cost of funds was 3.6% and our net interest spread was 2.1%. Total leverage for the fourth quarter was 6.1:1, while recourse leverage ended the quarter at 3.8:1. For the year, our economic net interest return on equity was 16% and our GAAP return on average equity was 11%.

Expenses for the fourth quarter, excluding servicing fees and deal expenses, were $16 million, up from the third quarter, related primarily to increased equity-based compensation and increased legal and diligence costs related to loan pool acquisitions.

This concludes our remarks. And we'll now open the call for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

(Operator Instructions) The first question comes from the line of Trevor Cranston with JMP Securities.

Trevor Cranston -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Hi. Thanks. Good morning. First question, you guys talked a bit about the spread widening across most asset classes, obviously, but particularly, the Agency sector. Can you expand a little bit on how you're thinking about the opportunity in terms of deploying capital in terms of Agency CMBS versus Agency RMBS? And also maybe add a little bit of color in terms of which particular sector of the Agency CMBS market you're looking at as a value? Thanks.

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

Good morning, Trevor. This is Mohit. So, as we stated on the opening remarks, Agency spreads, all fixed income spreads were wider materially in Q4. And Agency residential pass-throughs were on par between 5 basis points to 15 basis points depending on what part of the coupon factor you played in. And on the Agency CMBS side, those spreads gapped out materially as we headed into December with the looming government shutdown, and spreads were about 30 basis points to 40 basis points wider than where they ended in Q3.

Now, as we look at the investable landscape, 2019, to the extent we can find more Agency CMBS, we would definitely find those to be more attractive currently. And our focus there has been on the construction loan side, Ginnie Mae project loans. The levered returns there, based on the spread widening that took place in Q4, produced mid-teens levered returns. But given again the pending government shutdown, which has now reopened, flows have been very limited there, so the volumes haven't picked up. But on the Agency side, obviously, there's a lot more flow there. And I think levered returns, they are also in the low mid-teens. And all of the Agency CMBS(ph)buffy buy is government guaranteed. So it is Ginnie Mae FHA backed.

Trevor Cranston -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Got you. Okay. That's helpful. And in terms of credit, obviously, credit spreads have widened also. Have you guys seen any sort of increased opportunities to add outside the whole loan space? Are you seeing anything being more attractive within the CRT or the legacy non-Agency market?

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

On the legacy side, again, I think spreads have widened, but the levered returns there don't look that compelling. I think real money is a better bid. Financing rates, although improved significantly over the course of 2018, advance rates and spreads relative to LIBOR don't get you to double-digit returns currently. On the CRT side, there has been significant widening that took place, that is starting to look attractive, but again, we haven't really played in that space given some of the technical as a result of spread widening, continuing issuance from the GSEs and the like to sort of widen those spreads out even further.

What does look attractive to us is on the new issue fund, some of the securitizations that are currently being placed. Spreads have widened significantly on both rated and non-rated securitizations. Rated stuff is trading around 125 swaps, which was as tight as low 50s at the start of 2018. And the non-rated senior bonds are trading anywhere between 155 to 165, and those have gotten us tight as 90 area earlier in the year or so. Those parts of the capital stack do look attractive to us.

Trevor Cranston -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay. And when you say new issue, are you referring to like prime jumbo deals or non-QM or...

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

All of those. Prime jumbo, non-QM, rated RPOs, non-rated RPO transactions.

Trevor Cranston -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Got you. Okay. And then I guess the last thing, so we've heard some commentary that spreads have recovered somewhat since the end of the year. Can you guys give an update on how you think your book value has trended since December 31? Thanks.

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

Sure. I mean, the sentiment has definitely shifted as we headed into January. Both corporate spreads, high-yield spreads have firmed up and as has structured product mortgage spreads. And we are probably up roughly around 2% on book value since the end of the year.

Trevor Cranston -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay. Perfect. That's helpful. Thank you.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Bose George with KBW.

Eric Hagen -- KBW -- Analyst

Hey, thanks. Good Morning. It's Eric on for Bose. I guess just a two-part question on your capital structure. Can you just discuss how you're thinking about the capital stack with just the mix of common versus preferred and how you might look to change that mix going forward? The second question is just the preferred deal that you did in the early part of the year -- this year, can you just discuss where that capital went. It look -- it sounds like it probably went into the CMBS stuff that you just discussed, but maybe you can just give some color on where that went and just the pro forma leverage that came out of that deal? Thanks.

Robert Colligan -- Chief Financial Officer

Sure, Eric. This is Rob. So to take your questions in order, we have raised a fair amount of preferred equity over the last few years in the 8 percentage range. We've talked about that over time as being a good source of capital for us in a way to diversify and not to lose the common holders. We try to make sure our capital stack is as efficient as possible, and we'll look at alternate sources, including convertibles if that make sense, and we'll see how the stack evolves over time. I think in previous calls, I've talked about having 25% to 30% of our capital in preferred. We are getting closer to that, so we'll see how things go from there.

As far as deployment of capital, a fair amount of the capital that was raised the second half of last year went into Agencies. And Mo can give maybe a little bit more color on that, but I would say the majority went into Agency pass-throughs with some going into Agency CMBS. It's hard to acquire a lot of Agency CMBS at one point in time. So it's not like if we raise a lot of capital, we can just deploy all of it into the CMBS side.

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

And to expand on what Rob just said, yes, even in the Q4 -- Q3 raise that we did in September and invested the capital in Q4, the vast majority of that did go into pass-throughs. We were able to add CMBS when available. But to just size the market on the Agency CMBS side, originations on an annual basis range anywhere from $12 billion to $18 billion. So, obviously, it's a significantly smaller market to acquire assets in. And that trend hasn't really changed materially in Q1 given for the most part of January, there was a government shutdown, so originations weren't there. But again, as I mentioned earlier, the Agency residential pass-throughs still look attractive on a levered basis.

Eric Hagen -- KBW -- Analyst

Got it. That's really helpful. Maybe I can just press you a little bit just for the leverage that came out of the preferred deal that you did in the start of the year?

Robert Colligan -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. It's not something that we've disclosed to this point. We'll probably talk about that more in the first quarter. You're talking specifically about the Series D and how that was deploying the leverage on that?

Eric Hagen -- KBW -- Analyst

Correct, yes.

Robert Colligan -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. I think we'll hold off on that until Q1.

Eric Hagen -- KBW -- Analyst

Sure. All right. The second question is just around the -- on the credit piece. The transfer out of the credit reserve during the quarter, I think that's the first transfer out we've seen in a while. Maybe you can just give some color around what led to that and how we should think about the impact that has on the portfolio yield going forward? Thank you.

Robert Colligan -- Chief Financial Officer

Sure. Yes, I don't think the transfer out was that dramatic, and obviously, that's dependent on performance of cash flows. So I don't see a dramatic change in yields going forward based on that independently.

Eric Hagen -- KBW -- Analyst

Which segment of the credit portfolio did that come out of? Or I guess a better question would just be historically, you guys have taken -- the accounting has been the opposite, right, you've taken a release of credit. So what has just led to the difference between this past quarter versus last string of quarters?

Robert Colligan -- Chief Financial Officer

I wouldn't say there was any one thing in particular, and most of those are related to our non-Agency book. I don't think there was anything particularly unusual. Those positions are older and the performance could be potentially lumpy over time from quarter-to-quarter, but over a long period of time, I still think the yields on that portfolio will be very strong.

Eric Hagen -- KBW -- Analyst

Got it. Great. Thanks for the color, guys. Appreciate it.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Your next question comes from the line of Stephen Laws with Raymond James.

Stephen Laws -- Raymond James & associates Inc. -- Analyst

Hi, good morning. A couple of questions have already been hit on, but maybe to follow-up on one earlier. Are there any asset classes out there that have become significantly more attractive, that maybe aren't in the portfolio now that you're looking at? I know to previous question, you commented about new issue jumbo and non-QM securitizations, but what other asset classes out there are you guys looking at or are you pretty happy with just the ones you currently target?

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

Hey, Stephen, this is Mohit again. Yes. I mean, the asset mix we currently have, we're obviously very happy with and would add given the spread widening that has taken place. But as we search the landscape of investable assets, we continue to look at the non-QM space, volumes are picking up there. Our concern in the past has been around origination volumes and the ability to aggregate and size to do something meaningful with. We know that that has changed in 2018 and view the same changes affecting 2019. But we could either acquire loans and/or securitizations done by others given the spread widening. We've looked at sort of some residential transition loans where again volumes have picked up, that could be attractive to the portfolio. So I mean, we are always searching for landscape for new opportunities that would be accretive to the portfolio.

Stephen Laws -- Raymond James & associates Inc. -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks for that color. And I guess more from the macro side. I think a lot of the portfolio questions have been asked. But certainly, the interest rate outlook from here is different than maybe what the market expects in those pricing, six, 12 months ago. Has that changed your strategy at all as that rate forecast has changed? How is that impacted both, what you're doing on the portfolio side as well as on the financing cost? Can you maybe talk a little bit about how you responded to that change in interest rate outlook?

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

I'll start with the portfolio side first. I mean, most of what we own are fixed-rate assets, and we've issued both floating rate liabilities of them and the securitizations we have done. We had spent the better part of 2017 and '18 switching from fixed to floating given sort of the expectations of what the Fed may do. They did go four times, so we were able to lock in fixed rate liabilities on the vast majority of the '17 deals than lot of the '18 deals, but the last securitization we did in October of '18, we did keep it as a floating rate securitization given our outlook on what the Fed was going to do for the remainder of 2018 as we head into '19.

On the liability side, just our repo funding given the view on the Fed -- I mean, we've kept some of our Agency repos shorter in duration given the spread mismatch between one-month and three months LIBOR. So we bring -- we brought down the days -- the maturity on the repo significantly over the year given, I think, there was about a 25 basis point difference in one month, three-month funding rates currently. And as that converges based on what Powell had said I think in the late Jan meeting, I think we could extend that back out longer as the difference between the two rates closes in.

Stephen Laws -- Raymond James & associates Inc. -- Analyst

Great. Thanks a lot for taking my questions. I appreciate it.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Douglas Harter with Credit Suisse.

Douglas Harter -- Credit Suisse AG Research Division -- Analyst

Thanks. Can you just talk about how you see the attractiveness of business purpose loans, like single-family rental fix and flip and whether that's an asset class that's attracted to you today?

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

Hey. Good morning, Doug, Mohit again. So as I just mentioned on the last question, we have started to look at the residential transition loans or fixed and flipped depending on the nomenclature used. But our concern in the past has been around sort of getting volumes. We've noticed volumes have picked up, the rates that you could demand on those loans are higher than sort of the traditional 30-year fixed-rate mortgage loans, and we think those are -- offer an attractive opportunity to add to the portfolio and we are actively looking to source more of that product in 2019.

And on the single-family rental side, again, we're looking at that product, but the residential transition loans offer more spread currently on a levered basis.

Douglas Harter -- Credit Suisse AG Research Division -- Analyst

Got it. And then just to clarify on your prior commentary around kind of the new issue loans, jumbo or non-QM, when you were talking about the spread widening there, is that talking about the attractiveness of MBS off of other people issuances or the attractiveness of owning the loans outright?

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

No. So we -- the loan spreads have widened out in sympathy with everything else, but -- so has the securitization market for other people's issuances. So we could buy new issue product in the market that's issued by others. Like I said, the spreads there have widened out more materially than the loan pricing has done. So on the rated side, stuff has widened from mid-50 to swaps to 120 to 125, and on the non-rated side, stuff has widened from 90 to 155 in the last three to four months. I think both look attractive to us, it's where we could find product to invest in.

Douglas Harter -- Credit Suisse AG Research Division -- Analyst

All right. Thanks for that clarification, Mohit.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) And with no further questions, I'll hand the call back to Mr. Matthew Lambiase for closing remarks.

Matthew J. Lambiase -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, thank you very much for joining us on our fourth quarter 2018 Chimera Investment Corporation's earnings call. And we look forward to speaking to you in May for our first quarter. Thank you.

Operator

This does conclude today's conference call. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your line.

Duration: 33 minutes

Call participants:

Emily Mohr -- Head of Investor Relations

Matthew J. Lambiase -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Mohit Marria -- Chief Investment Officer

Robert Colligan -- Chief Financial Officer

Trevor Cranston -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Eric Hagen -- KBW -- Analyst

Stephen Laws -- Raymond James & associates Inc. -- Analyst

Douglas Harter -- Credit Suisse AG Research Division -- Analyst

More CIM analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

22 of 30 Dow stocks rise premarket

The 82-pointgain in futures YMH9, -0.09% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -0.14% is being fueled by premarket gains in 25 of 30 Dow components, led by Boeing Co. BA, +0.25% shares. Boeing's stock was up 0.9% ahead of the open, after J.P. Morgan raised its price target. Among other early leaders, shares of United Technologies Corp. UTX, -0.70% tacked on 0.7%, DowDuPont Inc. DWDP, +0.51% rose 0.7% and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. GS, -0.06% gained 0.6%. The most active stock was Apple Inc.'s AAPL, -0.36% which rose 0.3%, while the biggest decliner was UnitedHealth Group Inc.'s stock UNH, -1.33% which slipped 0.4%.

Have breaking news sent to your inbox. Subscribe to MarketWatch's free Bulletin emails. Sign up here.

Quote References YMH9 -22.00 -0.09% DJIA -34.09 -0.14% BA +1.03 +0.25% UTX -0.85 -0.70% DWDP +0.27 +0.51% GS -0.12 -0.06% AAPL -0.61 -0.36% UNH -3.49 -1.33% Show all references MarketWatch Partner Center Most Popular This is the thing most likely to cause you financial ruin — but few prepare for it Cannabis earnings: Pot stocks' downturn may drown Aurora and others in red ink Weak hands may be signalling a 'major market decline,' fund manager warns Ocasio-Cortez says the system is broken, and the internet goes wild Which Party Is Raising the Most Money for Midterm Campaigns?

Monday, February 11, 2019

Amber Road Inc (AMBR) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Amber Road Inc  (NYSE:AMBR)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 11, 2019, 5:00 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, and welcome to the Amber Road's Fourth Quarter and Full-Year Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. Kevin Brogan, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Kevin Brogan -- Investor Relations

Thank you, operator, and thank you for joining us on Amber Road's Fourth Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, today's conference call is being broadcast live via webcast. In addition, a replay of the call will be available on our website following the call. By now you should have received a copy of our press release that was distributed this afternoon. If you have not, it is available on the Investor Relations section of our website.

Before we begin, I would like to remind you that during today's call, we will be making forward-looking statements regarding future events and financial performance, including growth from our bookings and sales pipeline, client deployments, continued product demand and our guidance for our first quarter and full year fiscal 2019. We caution you that such statements reflect our best judgement based on factors currently known to us and that actual events or results could differ materially. Please refer to the documents we file from time-to-time with the SEC, in particular, our Form 10-K, 10-Q and our Form 8-K filed today with our press release. These documents contain and identify important risks and other factors that may cause our actual results to differ from those contained in our forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements made during the call are being made as of today. If this call is replayed or reviewed after today, the information presented during the call may not contain current or accurate information. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. We will provide guidance on today's call, but we will not provide any further guidance or updates on our performance during the quarter, unless we do so in a public forum.

I would also like to inform you that Amber Road, its Directors and certain of its executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from our shareholders in connection with our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is scheduled for Tuesday May 7. We intend to file our proxy statement and related proxy materials with the SEC in connection with any solicitation of proxies from our shareholders in connection with the 2019 Annual Meeting.

Shareholders of Amber Road are strongly encouraged to read such proxy has being and all other related materials filed with the SEC carefully and in their entirety when they become available, as they will contain important information about the 2019 Annual Meeting. We will not comment on any proxy contest or take any questions regarding any proxy contest on this call.

During the call, we will also discuss our non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. A reconciliation of the GAAP and non-GAAP results provided in today's press release. The projections that we provide today exclude stock-based compensation, which cannot be determined at this time and are, therefore, not reconciled in today's press release.

With that, I will turn the call over to our CEO, Jim Preuninger. Jim?

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Kevin. I'm very pleased with our results for 2018. When I look back our full year revenue for 2018 was in line with the original guidance given one year ago, and we beat our operating loss guidance by more than $5 million posting a non-GAAP operating profit for the year. We also performed very well against our quarterly guidance in 2018, as we came in at, or at the high end or exceeded our guidance range in each and every quarter. 2018 also marks the firm's transformation to generating consistent and meaningful levels of profit in cash flow, this journey begin at the end of 2015, but our shareholders talk to us about returning the company to profitability.

In that year, we had an adjusted EBITDA loss of $10.5 million and burned $13.2 million in cash from operations. In 2017, we improved to break even adjusted EBITDA with only a $670,000 cash burn. Today, I'm happy to report that we delivered adjusted EBITDA of $5.4 million, yielding a margin of 6.3% and we generated $3.3 million in cash flow from operations, our profit trend line has continued to improve. We've delivered on our profitability growth goals by creating a business that is financially strong with improving levels of profit and cash flow.

We believe in 2019 and beyond, we can continue to deliver against these key metrics by taking advantage of opportunities in global trade, bringing more focus to our sales and marketing efforts, driving expansion into new markets, and returning subscription revenue growth to the double-digit levels. Turning to our results for the fourth quarter, revenue and profit exceeded the high-end of our guidance driven by the strength in subscription revenue and improve subscription growth rates. Total revenue was $21.9 million, as subscription revenue increased 9% year-over-year to $16.3 million. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $1.6 million. Bookings for the year-ended on a strong note, including improved performance from Europe.

Our sales pipeline is balanced across the geographies and products we sell and at a higher level than this time last year. These things combined to position us very nicely for 2019. We have reorganized Amber Road's staff and focused our go-to-market programs around several key strategic objectives, which will drive our business forward in 2019 and beyond. I'll review a few of these enhancements with you next. We are helping our customers manage the increasing complexity and velocity of changes in global trade, much of which is driven by the U.S. trade wars, Brexit and an acceleration on new free trade agreement.

Our end markets are healthy, and we believe we are more efficient and more effective -- there are more efficient and effective ways to add new customers and expand across our blue-chip customer base. To do this, we are increasing our focus on a few key areas related to sales and marketing. We've created a new sales account management team dedicated to customer success and expansion to drive upsells and cross-sells. Our account managers were sourced from our professional services team, so they already had deep domain expertise, strong product skills and a proven customer service history. They are productive out of the gate and are hitting the street running.

We believe this new team can nurture existing accounts to drive more sales. With this team, we will also free up time for our Sales Directors to focus on what they do best, new customer acquisition. We rolled out the new account manager program in the United States in Q4 of last year by transitioning this responsibility to manage installed accounts to account managers we are effectively doubling the capacity of Sales Directors to chase new logo business, and because the account managers carry a quota, we now have more feet on the street closing business.

A great expansion story in the recent quarter happened is Synopsys, a leading global provider of electronic design, automation tools and services. Synopsys has been export customer of ours since 2017, when we replace the competitor's solution to manage their U.S. trade operations. We've done very well on the U.S. side of this business, but since that time, Synopsys has continued to struggle with all of the compliance work internationally using only manual processes and a globally distributed team. They realize that without a standardized automated solution for export compliance on a global scale, they were needlessly using resources limiting their ability to scale and exposing themselves to compliance risk. Therefore in the fourth quarter, our customer expanded their subscription with Amber Road to include several new modules to centralize compliance data, formalized and automate its processes globally.

The changes I just outlined to our sales organization are being supported with new technologies and thinking applied to marketing. Over the past 12 months, we have implemented an approach called Account Based Marketing in Europe and we are very pleased with those results. In case you aren't familiar with Account Based Marketing, it is designed to complement more traditional lead generation efforts to engage a specific set of highly valued targeted enterprise accounts. Account Based Marketing is abbreviated ABM. ABM facilitates alignment between various Amber Road functions, including sales, marketing, business development and product management to create better message -- messaging and higher levels of sales engagement with senior executive.

ABM marketing programs are laser focused and performed very well for us in 2018 in Europe and helped us win new accounts, such as LEGO. LEGO Group selected Amber Road's free trade agreements solution in the recent quarter as part of a global program to redesign its supply chain operations and maximize tax and duty savings on cross border trade all around the globe.

Our software will be used to ensure that LEGO is compliant with the complex rules of origin for more than 20 free trade agreements that covers, South America, Asia, North America and Europe. Amber Road was chosen for this large project because we are the only vendor supporting a large library of free trade agreements and can implement them economically through our quick start program. We believe we can leverage our win with LEGO and our new Account Based Marketing approach across other opportunities with similar characteristics and will replicate this success. We're now rolling out ABM across the globe to our teams in the United States and China.

LEGO also touches on another key strategic driver, free trade agreements. FTAs, free trade agreements are an important part of our competitive advantage. We have a big lead in terms of the capabilities of our software and the number of FTAs we support as well as the market awareness we've generated in the success we're having at leading companies across many verticals. We've seen strong adoption and a growing pipeline. So we're confident our momentum will continue to accelerate.

In addition, we continue to believe that with the new NAFTA called USMCA and the pending impact of Brexit, there will be a large number of customers who will need our help in additional trade content to successfully make the transition in 2019 and then 2020. These events should offer us a nice revenue boost later this year and into the next. China is also an important long-term strategic driver for our business, we continue to see strong activity for our China Trade Management solution as China overhauls there customs processes. Our CTM module provides us a fantastic gateway to many large customers using a moderately priced product that delivers a quick win and then opens the door for other opportunities to sell these customers more of our Global Trade Management or GTM suite.

Several great examples of our success in China this quarter include AkzoNobel and Ingersoll Rand. AkzoNobel is a leading maker of paints and coatings is headquartered in the Netherlands and has multiple facilities all across China. They selected our solution to automate their China import and export operations provide corporate level visibility in response to recent China regulation reform measures and to automate AEO certification and national declaration integration initiatives. We are very excited to service this new customer in China.

In another China example, Ingersoll Rand selected our CTM module in the recent quarter. Ingersoll Rand is a diversified industrial manufacturer for climate and industrial equipment. They have multiple facilities all across China engaged in China bonded manufacturing using the China Customs handbook. They selected Amber Road's China Trade Management solution to automate their handbook which was previously in all manual process. Our solution will provide them with operational visibility on the corporate level, minimized compliance risk and dramatically cut costs by increasing the efficiency within their China operations.

We had our best booking year ever in China in 2018 and saw great demand from multiple industries, including automotive, chemical, pharmaceutical, industrial manufacturers, high-technology and retail. As an example of our effects in the retail vertical, we closed business in the fourth quarter in China, with Tiffany Company. Tiffany and company is one of the world's foremost luxury brand. They have subscribed to multiple modules, including our Global Product Master -- master and China Trade Management. With hundreds of thousands of products, it was critical that Tiffany need to be able to maintain accurate trade data, especially for product classification. They had a lean team of compliance experts and only manual processes that we're using spreadsheets and emails. So the team couldn't keep up with the higher volumes of foreign trade.

New regulations and trade complexity were leading to delays and errors. With the expansion plans on the horizon, the company recognized the need to improve productivity and responsiveness without increasing headcount now. Tiffany wanted a single global database to manage product classifications, trade data and to automate their cross border processes, because Amber Road pioneered this kind of automation. We remain unique in the marketplace and had a compelling proposition to offer Tiffany, as they compared us to less mature offerings both in China and here in the United States.

Our market in China has shifted. So while selling CTM is a good business for us in China, we are also seeing opportunities to expand our sales coverage and marketing efforts to encompass our full Global Trade Management platform with large Chinese national companies. There are many causes for this new demand. Many countries along with the United States are telling China to play by the rules. In response, China Central Government is now rigorously enforcing compliance of trade regulations to demonstrate to the rest of the world that they can be reliable trading partner. The result is that Chinese companies are starting to look toward ways in which they can automate their global trade to be in compliance.

We're taking advantage of this emerging trend by training all of our staff in Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hong Kong to recognize those opportunities and to sell our broader GTM platform. We're still early in this process, but we believe this is a sizable opportunity for us and one in which we are well positioned given our on ground presence, unique set of solutions, deep set of trade content that's integrated with those solutions and a long list of referencable customers in the region.

And finally, we've executed very well against our strategic objective to build a business that can deliver solid growth combined with increasing levels of adjusted EBITDA and cash flow to strengthen our financial position. We took important steps in 2018 across the business that position us well for 2019 and the longer term. As Tom will detail in a moment, our 2019 guidance calls for double-digit subscription growth rates exiting the year and full-year adjusted EBITDA margins that will continue to expand. Based on our 2019 guidance which represents good revenue performance and a continued strong profit trend, plus our growing pipeline of opportunities in the macro tailwinds related to global trade. We believe now is the right time to provide you with some additional insight into how we're building the business for the longer term. We've spent considerable time working on our miles this year and next. My comments about 2020 represent management's goals and our Board support for management, based on the strong fundamentals that they see. For 2020, we currently believe that Amber Road can sustain double digit subscription revenue growth and expand adjusted EBITDA margins into the double digits, while improving our cash flow. We believe the fundamentals are in place for great 2019 and an even better 2020.

With that let me turn it over to Tom.

Thomas E. Conway -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Jim. I'll start with a detailed overview of our fourth quarter 2018 financial performance and then provide some commentary on our first quarter and full year 2019 outlook. Following my closing remarks, we'll open up the call for questions. As a reminder, we adopted ASC 606 on a modified retrospective basis in 2018.

Regarding the fourth quarter results. Beginning with the statement of operations, we generated GAAP revenue in the quarter of $21.9 million compared to $20.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2018. Subscription revenue was $16.3 million an increase of 96% compared to $14.9 million in the prior year period and represents accelerating growth from the prior quarter. Professional services revenue was $5.6 million in line with our expectations. This amount compared to $5.7 million in the same period a year ago.

Our trailing 12-months recurring revenue retention rate through December was 101%, reflecting the long-term value of our customer relationships. We have sustained high levels of recurring revenue for the past five years, giving us a high level of revenue and billings visibility in the forward quarters. On a GAAP basis, our gross profit was $12.6 million or 58% of total revenue compared to $11.4 million or 55% of total revenue in the prior year period. Subscription gross profit was $10.9 million or 67% of subscription revenue compared to $9.9 million or 66% of subscription revenue in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Our gross profit on professional services was $1.8 million or 31% of professional services revenue. This gross profit performance compares to $1.5 million or 26% of professional services revenue in the same period last year. On a GAAP basis, total operating expenses were $14.8 million compared to $13.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. Our fourth quarter GAAP operating loss was $2.1 million compared to a GAAP operating loss of $1.9 million in the fourth quarter of last year. On a non-GAAP basis, operating income was $392,000 an improvement compared to an operating loss of $85,000 in the year-ago period. This performance was well ahead of our guidance.

Non-GAAP operating income for the fourth quarter of 2018 excludes stock-based compensation. We are pleased with the leverage we are seeing in the business as we continue to drive both growth and profitability and we believe we have set the company on a path to deliver improved levels of profit and cash flow. As we do this, we will continue to make investments in sales, marketing and research and development to support the opportunities we see ahead for the business.

Our GAAP net loss was $2.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2018, compared to a GAAP net loss of $1.8 million in the prior year period. GAAP net loss per share was $0.09 in the fourth quarter of 2018 compared to a net loss per share of $0.07 in the fourth quarter of 2017. These amounts are based on $28.1 and $27.5 million shares outstanding respectively. On a non-GAAP basis, net loss was $87,000 in the fourth quarter of 2018 which compares to a non-GAAP net loss of $10,000 in the prior year period.

On a non-GAAP basis, we're break even per share in the fourth quarter of 2018 in line with the prior year period. These per share amounts are based on $28.1 million and $27.5 million shares outstanding respectively. We are very happy to report another great quarter of positive adjusted EBITDA. For the fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA was $1.6 million positive, an improvement compared to adjusted EBITDA of $1.3 million in the same period last year. Cash flow used in operations in the fourth quarter of 2018 was $1.6 million compared to $2.1 million generated in Q4 2017.

Now, I'll quickly recap our full year results. 2018 total GAAP revenue was $85.2 million, up 8% year-over-year. Subscription revenue was $62.6 million, increasing 7% over 2017. Professional services revenue was $22.5 million, increasing 9% over 2017. On a non-GAAP basis, operating income was $428,000 in 2018 compared to a loss of $5.3 million in 2017. Non-GAAP operating income for the full year 2018 excludes stock-based compensation.

On a non-GAAP basis our net loss was $1.3 million in 2018, this compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $6.9 million in 2017. Non-GAAP net loss per share was $0.05 in 2018 compared to a loss of $0.25 in the prior year. These per share amounts are based on $27.8 million and $27.4 million shares outstanding respectively. Adjusted EBITDA for 2018 was $5.4 million a meaningful improvement compared to an adjusted EBITDA of $87,000 in 2017. Turning the focus to our balance sheet, as of December 31 2018 we had cash and cash equivalents of $7.5 million compared to $10.1 million as of September 30, 2018.

Cash flow provided by active -- by operating activities in 2018 was $3.3 million compared to a usage of $670,000 in 2017. Before turning to guidance, I'm pleased to note that we have renegotiated the credit agreement that governs our term loan and revolver, extending the maturity date by two years from December 31, 2019 to December 31,2021 while preserving the favorable attributes of the agreement. We continue to believe that we have ample liquidity to effectively run the business and support the strategic initiatives of the company.

Turning to guidance. For full year 2019, our guidance calls for subscription growth to be the driver of our business. Based on the strength of our 2018 bookings, our pipelines and the strategic initiatives Jim outlined, we expect subscription revenue to show improving year-over-year growth rate as we move through the quarters and to exit double digit -- exit the year at double-digit year-over-year growth.

As we further utilize our Quick Start programs, we believe services will be approximately flat year-over-year in 2019 and beyond. Moving to the specifics, our 2019, full-year guidance is as follows. We expect total revenue to be in the range of $88.7 million to $91.7 million. We expect non-GAAP adjusted operating income to be in the range of break even to $3 million. On a per share basis, we are expecting a range of non-GAAP adjusted net loss per share of $0.06 to non-GAAP income per share of $0.04, these amounts assume $29 million basic shares outstanding to $32.4 million fully diluted shares outstanding.

We also expect to continue to generate positive cash flow from operations through 2019. Turning to the first quarter of 2019, we expect some seasonal sequential declines in professional services. Additionally, Q4 2018 benefited slightly from transaction revenue and traditionally we don't experience material transactional levels in Q1. Coupled with some deferred starts on Q4 2018 bookings. We expect these impact to subscription revenue to be more than offset beginning in Q2 and to see nice sequential subscription growth throughout 2019.

Our Q1 2019 guidance is as follows. Total revenue is expected to be in the range of $20.3 million to $20.9 million. Non-GAAP adjusted operating loss is expected to be in the range of $700,000 to $100,000. Non-GAAP adjusted net loss per share is expected to be in the range of $0.04 to $0.02 assuming $28.3 million basic shares outstanding. Our expectations of non-GAAP loss from operations and non-GAAP loss per basic share for the first quarter and full year of 2019 excludes stock-based compensation.

As Jim noted, we are building a business to drive long-term growth and profit, we've been very successful in delivering on our strategic objective to manage the business, to improving levels of profit and cash flow. As we look to 2020, we believe we can deliver both double digit subscription growth and adjusted EBITDA margins along with improving levels of cash flow. We believe this positions us well for long-term future success.

Operator, please open the line for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

(Operator Instructions) And we'll take our first question today from Scott Berg with Needham & Company.

Scott Berg -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Hi, Jim and Tom. Congrats on the good quarter. I got a couple of questions here for you. Tom, let's start with the guidance for the year, total revenue growth a little bit lower year-over-year. It sounds like some -- professional services are flat and subscription has a little bit of a delay in some fourth quarter bookings. How normal is that to have some of your subscription contracts have a -- maybe a one or two quarter delay before they get ramped up?

Thomas E. Conway -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, that's fairly common Scott. It's a phenomenon we've seen now, a number of years. It depends -- in certain quarters it maybe more amplified, but as you going into any given year. Our backlog of subscription revenue is pretty well known obviously, the existing deals, what we call the installed base is in the contract or an easy to model, and we feel very good about the size of our pipeline and our ability to execute for new revenue from subscriptions in 2019 as well.

Scott Berg -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Got it, helpful. And then Jim you talked about bookings improving in Europe. How would you quantify the year overall on a bookings perspective. You sound pleased, but were bookings is actually up or I should say new bookings up year-over-year?

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, new bookings are up year-over-year and we had a lot of strength, I think in Europe and China. I mentioned China was the best year-ever and as you might recall, we reorganized our sales leadership and asked one of our senior executives to accept the transfer to our Munich operation this time last year and so, it has impact there, it has been well dealt, introduction of Account Based Marketing in Europe, we reorganized the team, we recruited some new folks. A lot of the bigger transactions that I've talked about over the year attributed to the success that they've had -- this -- the LEGO deal in particular, that was a European initiatives.

So we're lucky, we're just executing well, but we are performing well and it's very balanced in that. So we have good deals in Europe, good deals in the mid-market, doing well in the rest of the U.S. and obviously in China and it's across the product spectrum. So as well free trade agreements in those a real hot module for us, in all other things are selling very well also. So it's a nice healthy position for us Scott.

Scott Berg -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Wonderful. I guess last question for me then, Jim is, you talked about the new cross-sell sales team that you're putting together with the people. The individuals responsible from your professional services team and you've seen some early positive results. I guess the question is, how should we view the expectations for this type of team going forward to this next year because that can clearly provide some ups -- upside here in prior bookings trajectory? Thank you.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Well, I think, look at the good news is we took some fairly senior experienced people. They know our products, they know our policies, the people, how we do business. They were customer facing, they're very relax and comfortable with our customers and they can have a very deep level of conversation with them. Many of the folks that were recruited for this new environment in are -- are very familiar with the customers that they got assigned to them. So they roll very naturally from this role, because they have those relationships. And I think the typical inertia you have with hiring a new salesman is of virtually eliminated with this team and I think that the benefit here is -- these people get to spend more time, quality time, nurturing accounts, solving problems describing to them, our product roadmap, the things that we're seeing in the industry, new trends and experiences we're have -- we are having with other customers and I think it's just going to lead to far more upsells and cross sells.

Our our sales directors, which have traditionally sold new logos and then continue to manage those installed accounts frankly, weren't always as engaged in the latter activity. No, they were out hunting and I think they did a good job of that and so we said this is a good division here, this is a good opportunity, when we have such a large installed base to divide it up and to give each group of professionals, the opportunity to do what they do best. So it's really a plus point.

Scott Berg -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Thanks for taking my questions. I'll jump in the queue.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Scott.

Operator

Next we'll hear from Tom Roderick with Stifel.

Tom Roderick -- Stifel -- Analyst

Hey, gentlemen, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. Kind of want to go back and piggyback on Scott's question there, thinking a little bit more about the guidance here for the coming year, and so the cadence of it. So, if I remember back to last year, the guidance and the goal for the end of this year was to kind of get to double-digit revenue growth by the end of this year, and got pretty darn close. Maybe not all the way there and then it seems like a little bit of a temporary step back before things reaccelerate.

So if we kind of put all that together, I guess the first part of the question would be number one, how should we think about the first quarter subscription sort of growth goal, is that something that pulls back-to-mid single digits temporarily is a lower than that. I guess, if I kind of parse it against your comments on professional services, those could be down 5% or 10%. So maybe just a little bit more clarity. So we're in the right ballpark and thinking about Q1 and then relative to the reacceleration for the end of 2019 and beyond. How are you feeling about sales capacity. I look at the kind of sales and marketing number and again it's been kind of flattish on a spend basis for a few years. Do you need to accelerate the spend there or is it just pipeline and conversion rates, you expect to go up this year? Thanks guys.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So the first part of your question, Tom, on what we're expecting for the first quarter. So the subscription -- I think about subscription growth rate on a year-over-year basis that are going to be in the low to mid-single digits and accelerating throughout the year based on the timing of the deferred starts and the bookings that we -- in the pipeline that we think are going to contribute nicely to the year. And obviously we'll -- the model we have is improving quarter-over-quarter on the subscription line and exiting as we said in our script above double-digit. So setting us up nicely for 2020.

Thomas E. Conway -- Chief Financial Officer

Okay. We saw a similar cadence in 2018. So a little bit of a repeat but the models are really built with a lot of details to them and we do have good visibility into that installed base. So we feel good about that.

Tom Roderick -- Stifel -- Analyst

So I'm not sure which one you wants to tackle this part of the question, you mentioned it on the script, and Tom I appreciate you mentioning it again. So, it sounds like you've got a couple of deals and maybe there are significant deals that you booked in the fourth quarter that have some deferred start. Can you just kind of go into what the magnitude of those look like and what the timing of the deal starts to look like, that we already started. Are those things that have a specific timeline on them, are they meaningful?

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I mean this is Jim speaking. So, we saw it last year to where -- a lot of the deals we road in December, and when we get around to negotiating subscription start dates. There's a discussion about when the project will meaningfully kickoff and get rolling and that generally doesn't happen in January or February. So we have some contracts that has subscription starts in March, others that are early in mid of Q2. So -- and I think that -- that was the right answer for the customers, its the right answer for us too. So it is a -- we tend to negotiate those contracts and look at the long-term relationship and if I miss a couple months of subscription revenue, its not end of the world.

Tom Roderick -- Stifel -- Analyst

Got it, OK.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Your last question about sales capacity, it's -- Tom, I just wanted to get back. So with this account management team putting in place, it really pulls away a lot of burden, a lot of time that was spent by sales directors, working with those installed accounts and I mean -- even though, they may not have been equipped as well to deal with, and there was just always -- issues and communications and things that they needed to be responsible for. So, we've really freed up a lot of their time here in the United States, but we do intend to add to our sales ranks with new hires throughout the year. So, it's an area we want to invest in, we see good opportunities. There is some -- there are some nice markets that are untapped that we haven't been to yet, and so we're going to -- we're going to make those investments throughout the year.

Tom Roderick -- Stifel -- Analyst

And Jim, a quick follow-up on that question about sales capacity. I appreciate your comments there about the shifting nature of market demand in China, where the full GTM opportunity seems more in the scope now. Can you do that with the existing sales team over there effectively put the whole -- the whole suite and the existing reps bag over there or does that require additive capacity in a different go-to-market.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Yes, yes and yes. So we -- I think we have a great team there. They've been been with us a while, they've been real successful sell in China Trade Management. They know compliance code, they know the market very well. Now, there is some new products, Global Trade Management is a suite of solutions that they've not sold before or they sold maybe just on a very limited basis. So we spend a lot of time last fall, training, we had folks in education, the sales as well as product training and we're going to back them up. So, there's an engagement model that includes an awful lot of support from select folks on our staff in the U.S. and in Europe, who will be working with them to -- help them throughout the year. Come up to speed and certainly, if we have the bigger engagements, we are going to be all over that. We will support it ever -- anyway we can.

Tom Roderick -- Stifel -- Analyst

Great. Last quick one from me, as I think about your comments regarding EBITDA margins continuing to expand this year? Tom, where would you suggest we look for the majority of leverage in the model. Should that come again on the G&A and R&D side, should we look for it somewhere else? How do we think about where we get some of that margin expansion and can we see more of it on the gross margin side this year? Thanks.

Thomas E. Conway -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, thanks, Tom. We've been -- if you watch the subscription lines, subscription COGS we've been adding sequentially to the margin there. So the -- at the COGS level we are continuing to push on the levers that have helped us grow through '17 and '18 at that level. So we'll definitely get contribution at the gross margin level. We will see in the areas that offers -- as obvious, G&A will be one where we get leverage. R&D to some extent and sales and marketing, the least of the operating expenses, because as we said we are investing in that regard, maybe a little bit lower than we would in R&D as a percentage of revenue, but the most critical component for us on that, we're generating sequentially better margins at the gross margin level.

Tom Roderick -- Stifel -- Analyst

One-off. Thank you, gentlemen. I'll jump back in queue.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Tom.

Operator

We now hear from Glenn Mattson with Ladenburg.

Glenn Mattson -- Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services -- Analyst

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. So, maybe, I think it was to Jim, could you repeat some of the comments around 2020, I kind of missed that, you laid out kind of a framework for how to think about growth rates and margins as you look into that year?

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So specifically what I said is, we spent as we always do a lot of time looking at our models and doing scenario building for 2019, but our model usually goes out to current year plus one, and given some good metrics that we are seeing, some good momentum, I think better fundamentals a lot of -- a lot of demand in the marketplace. Now given those macro tailwinds we talked about, we thought -- we felt pretty good about 2020 as well. I mean, there's a lot of year left. We got to get through '19 for sure, but we looked at our 2020 model. We probably -- obviously have those discussions with our Board, we look out multiple years and everybody thought it -- now its probably a good time to share more of that with you folks. I mean that it's a question we often get asked how do you look longer-term. So rather than just (inaudible) on the call.

So I -- specifically in my comments were given the plan that we have in front of us for '19 exiting the year with double-digit subscription growth in Q4. We see that ability -- that trend continuing in the 2020. So we'll have double-digit subscription growth quarter-over-quarter, each quarter in 2020. We also believe that with improving, EBITDA margins will reach a point that in 2020 we will have double-digit EBITDA margins at that point as well.

Glenn Mattson -- Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services -- Analyst

Okay, great, that's helpful, thanks. So, I guess you talked a little bit about your confidence in that number, but maybe some more about what's kind of backing it up. I mean, there is a lot of trade -- geopolitical stuff going on. So I guess it's partly that, but, has that driven the growth rate for the industry higher, to a point where you feel more comfortable about projecting better -- better results for that far period up?

Thomas E. Conway -- Chief Financial Officer

Well, I can't talk about growth rates for the industry, but I -- just --again, what we see with the deals that come to the table, the quality of the deals, the types of transactions that we're writing in the kinds that are in our pipeline. We're positioned really well to compete for these things, when people are trying to solve problems in China, we're -- we have really the best game in town. When they want to implement free trade agreements and we're becoming the best game in town. And when they want to solve a global trade problem on a global scale and that's just a small regional scale or just do something simple with exporter, something simple with -- visibility, but they really want to tackle this thing from end to end, with the best game in town. So I think that the problem is better defined. I think, we certainly see it almost daily in the news, it's not just a U.S. phenomenon its global. Right, so I think global trade is topical and we've made a big long hard investment to get to this position, and we're starting to see the opportunity develop in front of us in a nice way.

Glenn Mattson -- Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services -- Analyst

Thanks for that. And last thing would be just as you look at the year and how it plays out with all the geopolitical events going on, something, as far as Brexit goes, not quite as planned or if maybe the USMCA is not signed by Congress or something like that, are those kind of things, the kind of items that could flare up suddenly and create a situation where you have to kind of readjust your outlook for the year or is that kind of thing or those kind of things you think you'll manage through regardless of which way they -- the chips fall and some of these issues that are still outstanding?

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Well, look, I have to say that there are puts and takes in this and there could be -- those types of changes that we'd have to adjust for, but there is enough of them, right -- there is enough of a positive trend for us. I think overall, we have a lot of levers to pull. I mean, I will tell you, we have a -- the USMCA trade agreement largely done. It hasn't been ratified yet, but we have customers right now that are taking pre-orders for it.

Brexit threat around the corner, and we've been talking about it for a while, but that deadline is looming in any moving and its going to be -- a lot of companies, I think -- you're going to scrambled pretty quick '19 and 2020 to try to put some solutions in place to deal with them more effectively. So those are two initiatives what we talked about with China, the trade wars. I mean, all of these, these things can move a little right, move a little left but again on balance, I think it sets us up really well.

Glenn Mattson -- Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services -- Analyst

Okay, great, thanks. I'll pass on to the next caller.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Glenn.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) We'll hear from Jason Celino with KeyBanc Capital Market.

Jason Celino -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst

Hey guys, thanks for taking my question. I just had a couple of clarifying ones. So first of all, kind of high level question. We're entering the second/third year of an environment with increased trade agreement uncertainty, you mentioned trade wars, overall complexity in global trade, overall it's increasing. What continues to be the most difficult part of us, over the sale, given these kind of tailwinds. And then how, kind of those conversations changed over the last year -- two years?

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Well, I think the problems becoming more immediate. So, we started to talk about Brexit in September, October of 2017, but the time frames that people had to be planning and thinking about this and actually what the plan for was, was really unknown. I mean, how the UK would breakaway and what type of systems we're going to be required, and what the regulations would look like completely unknown there right.

And so I think while we could run a seminar in London and get 600 people to attend it that -- to talk about how we might speculate or other experts that we might bring into might speculate about what would happen. There wasn't a clear direction to take yet on that one, and I think the thing its been true with NAFTA, until the USMCA came together and we had at least at a senior level everybody in agreement has been ratified yet, but the big negotiation is largely done. It hasn't been immediate or actionable for our customers. This is the year where these things become actionable.

Jason Celino -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst

Okay, thanks. That's actually very helpful. And then kind of last clarifying question, you talked about some of the member -- more senior members of your customer service organization moving into some cross sell roles. Are you going to be back filling the roles they had previously?

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Oh, yeah, yeah, but it's a large team, our professional services staff, it wasn't customers for our -- professional services. Those are the people that helped new customers get trained and understand best practices and implement our solution so that staff as well over 100, I mean, we didn't pull up many over into sales, but it was a good team and our Head of Professional Services is already got plans on backfilling. So, we're in good shape.

Jason Celino -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst

Okay, thanks. That's all my questions.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Hey Jason, thank you.

Operator

That will conclude today's question-and-answer session. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. Preuninger for any additional or closing remarks.

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

So everybody -- thank you very much for dialing in and listening to the call. We appreciate your support and looking forward to speaking with you again soon. Thank you, operator.

Operator

Thank you. That does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for participation, you may now disconnect.

Duration: 50 minutes

Call participants:

Kevin Brogan -- Investor Relations

James Preuninger -- Chief Executive Officer

Thomas E. Conway -- Chief Financial Officer

Scott Berg -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Tom Roderick -- Stifel -- Analyst

Glenn Mattson -- Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services -- Analyst

Jason Celino -- KeyBanc Capital Market -- Analyst

More AMBR analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.